Oregon Fish Passage Barriers

Metadata:

• Identification_Information
• Data_Quality_Information
• Spatial_Data_Organization_Information
• Spatial_Reference_Information
• Entity_and_Attribute_Information
• Distribution_Information
• Metadata_Reference_Information

Identification_Information:

Citation:

Citation_Information:

Originator: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Publication_Date: 20110217

Title: Oregon Fish Passage Barriers

Edition: Version 2

Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data

Other_Citation_Details:

Information on the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard can be found online at <http://www.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/docs/bioscience/OregonFishPassageBarrierDataStandardv1dot1.pdf>

Online_Linkage:

<http://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/nrimp/default.aspx?pn=fishbarrierdata>

Description:

Abstract:

The Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) dataset contains barriers to fish passage in Oregon watercourses. Barriers include the following types of natural or artificial structures: bridges, cascades, culverts, dams, debris jams, fords, natural falls, tide gates, and weirs. The OFPBDS dataset does not include structures which are not associated with in-stream features (such as dikes, levees or berms). Barriers are structures which do, or potentially may, impede fish movement and migration. Barriers can be known to cause complete or partial blockage to fish passage, or they can be completely passable, or they may have an unknown passage status.
The second publication of the OFPBDS dataset (Version 2) complies with version 1.1 of the data standard. New optional attributes have been added to describe fish passage barrier feature modifications, to describe supplementary information (via a comments field) and also to linear reference the barrier features to the National Hydrography Dataset. Linear referencing attributes for the Pacific Northwest Hydrography have been retained in this version of the publication datasets, however they are no longer part of the data standard and will be removed from the next dataset publication version.
Version 2 of the OFPBDS dataset contains over 28,000 barrier features from sixteen separate sources including: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Department of Water Resources (OWRD), Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF), Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB), US Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Nez Perce Tribe, Benton SWCD, Washington county and watershed councils representing the Rogue, Umpqua, Siuslaw, Santiam, Calapooia, Clackamas and Scapoose basins.
The Data Steward obtained fish passage barrier data from multiple data originators between 2008 and 2010, collaborated with them to develop inclusion / exclusion criteria and dataset specific crosswalks for converting data from its original data structure to the structure of the OFPBDS. The data were then converted into the OFPBDS format and analyzed for duplication with existing OFPBDS barrier features. Where duplicates were identified, depending upon the scenario, one feature was either chosen over the other or in some cases attributes from different sources are combined. Source information is retained for each feature. The data were then loaded into the OFPBDS database. Barrier features were linear referenced and the corresponding optional attribute elements were populated. The data conversion, duplication reconciliation and linear referencing protocols are documented in the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Management Plan.
A separate dataset containing fish passage barrier features that have been completely removed (e.g. dam removals and culvert replacements) will be published simultaneously with version 2 of the OFPBDS dataset.
The OFPBDS database does not represent a comprehensive record of fish passage barriers in Oregon. Attributes (including key attributes such as fish passage status) are often incomplete. Consistency in attribution also varies among data originators. Field verification of barrier features and their attributes will be an important component to making this dataset comprehensive, current and accurate.
Fish passage status is a key attribute. Many barrier features - including all ODOT barriers - have an unknown passage status. For other features, the passage status may have changed since documented.
Note that this metadata file is best viewed in ArcCatalog with the FGDC Classic Stylesheet.
Documentation for the OFPBDS can be found online at <http://www.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/docs/bioscience/OregonFishPassageBarrierDataStandardv1dot1.pdf>.

Purpose:

This dataset is ultimately intended to support the need for an accurate, current and complete representation of the fish passage barriers affecting fish migration throughout the state. The Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) will provide a consistent and maintainable structure for both producers and users of fish passage barrier data.

Time_Period_of_Content:

Time_Period_Information:

Single_Date/Time:

Calendar_Date: 20110217

Currentness_Reference: publication date

Status:

Progress: In work

Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: Continually

Spatial_Domain:

Bounding_Coordinates:

West_Bounding_Coordinate: -124.776293

East_Bounding_Coordinate: -116.523447

North_Bounding_Coordinate: 46.259010

South_Bounding_Coordinate: 41.923154

Keywords:

Theme:

Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None

Theme_Keyword: fish passage barriers

Theme_Keyword: barriers

Theme_Keyword: dams

Theme_Keyword: culverts

Theme_Keyword: tide gates

Theme_Keyword: bridges

Theme_Keyword: fords

Theme_Keyword: water diversions

Theme_Keyword: weirs

Theme_Keyword: falls

Theme_Keyword: cascades

Theme_Keyword: fish passage

Theme:

Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category

Theme_Keyword: biota

Theme_Keyword: environment

Theme_Keyword: geoscientificInformation

Theme_Keyword: inlandWaters

Place:

Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None

Place_Keyword: Oregon

Place_Keyword: OR

Place_Keyword: Pacific Northwest

Access_Constraints: None.

Use_Constraints: See Distribution Liability.

Point_of_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Address:

Address_Type: mailing and physical address

Address: 3406 Cherry Avenue NE

City: Salem

State_or_Province: Oregon

Postal_Code: 97303

Country: United States

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Data_Set_Credit:

Barrier features originate primarily from the following agencies: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon Department of Transportation, Oregon Department of Water Resources, Oregon Department of Forestry, Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, US Bureau of Land Management, Nez Perce Tribe, Benton SWCD, Washington County and watershed councils representing the Rogue, Umpqua, Siuslaw, Santiam, Calapooia, Clackamas and Scapoose basins.

Security_Information:

Security_Classification: Unclassified

Native_Data_Set_Environment:

Microsoft Windows XP Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 3; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.3.1.3000

Cross_Reference:

Citation_Information:

Originator: Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife

Publication_Date: 3/2010

Title: Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data

Online_Linkage: <http://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/nrimp/default.aspx?pn=fishdistdata>

Cross_Reference:

Citation_Information:

Originator: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Publication_Date: 2/2011

Title: Oregon Fish Passage Barriers - Removed and Replaced Features

Edition: version 2

Online_Linkage:

<http://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/nrimp/default.aspx?pn=fishbarrierdata>

Data_Quality_Information:

Attribute_Accuracy:

Attribute_Accuracy_Report:

Barrier features in the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) dataset contain the attributes which were provided by the data originators. When barrier data are converted into the OFPBDS format, attributes for certain fields (e.g. fish passage status - fpbFPasSta) become standardized. Among the source datasets, there is wide variation in the number and type of attributes, including those that relate to OFPBDS fields. Attribute values for particular fields are not always consistent among the originators. Many barrier records may contain information which does not reflect existing barrier conditions because feature conditions have changed since the last assessment or because more recent information has not yet been incorporated into the database. Many of the source datasets contain records collected years ago or records which are considered temporary (such as those ODOT features with a fpbOFtrID value beginning with "T"). Some features contain current and accurate attribution and others may not. In cases where attributes have been populated through automated data processing routines (e.g. linear referencing), quality assurance measures have been taken to identify and correct inaccurate assignement of attribute values. In order to improve the quality of the OFPBDS dataset over the coming months and years, field verification of fish passage barriers will be essential for improving the currency, completeness and accuracy of the data.

Completeness_Report:

The Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) database is not a comprehensive representation of fish passage barriers in Oregon. Version 2 contains barrier features from approximately 16 agencies / organizations that are listed in the abstract. The OFPBDS database may not contain all the barrier records from any one agency. Existing fish passage barrier data from most agencies / organizations in Oregon have been incorporated into the OFPBDS database. Data from the US Forest Service, Clackamas county and likely other sources will be incorporated into a future version of the dataset. Though the intent is to make the OFPBDS database comprehensive, current and accurate, the dataset remains a work in progress.

Positional_Accuracy:

Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:

Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:

Locational accuracy of barrier features varies. The fpbLocAccu attribute provides a measure for positional accuracy for a given record. Some of the barrier records are accurately mapped (within 40 feet), others are not (with features mapped beyond 40 feet of their true location, some possibly hundreds of feet away).

Lineage:

Source_Information:

Source_Time_Period_of_Content:

Time_Period_Information:

Range_of_Dates/Times:

Beginning_Date: 1996

Ending_Date: 2011

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: ODFW Fish Passage Barrier Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: ODOT Drainage Facility Management System

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: BLM - District Level Fish Passage Barrier Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Oregon Water Resources Department Dams Dataset

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Oregon Department of Forestry Fish Presence Survey Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Umpqua Basin Fish Access Team Fish Passage Barrier Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Rogue Basin Fish Access Team Fish Passage Barrier Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation:

Benton County Soil and Water Conservation District Fish Passage Barrier Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Nez Perce - Wallowa County Fish Passage Barrier Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Washington County Fish Passage Barrier Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Clackamas Basin Council Fish Passage Barrier Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Calapooia Watershed Council Fish Passage Barrier Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Santiam Watershed Council Fish Passage Barrier Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Scappoose Bay Watershed Council Fish Passage Barrier Data

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Source_Information:

Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Siuslaw Watershed Council

Source_Contribution: See process steps for more details.

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Compiled fish passage barrier data from multiple agencies, counties, watershed councils and one tribe into the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) geodatabase.
In compiling fish passage barrier features from the different data originators into the OFPBDS database, the Data Steward followed some general guidelines: 1. Identify and acquire data and metadata. 2. Data Discovery. Review metadata to ensure an understanding of the data; its primary content, characteristics, capabilities and limitations. Develop key questions of usability for purposes of meeting the requirements of the standard, especially related to unique IDs, location, barrier type and passage status. 3. Consult with originator to answer questions and resolve outstanding issues (e.g. persistent unique IDs) for meeting the requirements of the standard. 4. Determine appropriate subset to incorporate, if any, based on presence of location data, unique IDs, specific attribution (e.g., exclude cross drain culverts - culverts not on stream crossings). 5. Develop a proposed methodology for converting the data into the OFPBDS format. Seek input and approval from the data originator for the data conversion methodology. Address issues as necessary so there is agreement on the methodology. 6. Process the data into the standard format. 7. Perform quality assurance routines to ensure that the data have been converted to the standardized format according to plan. 8. Analyze the data to determine whether there are duplicate barrier records coming from multiple sources. Address duplicate records according to established protocols that are found in the Barrier Data Management Plan. 9. Linear reference barrier features. 10. Reconcile barrier data with the Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory. 11. Document data processing steps. 12. Load the data into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
The steps outllined above were used by the Data Steward to standardize barrier data from the multiple sources that were compiled and integrated. The process by which data were converted into the OFPBDS format and loaded into the OFPBDS database required collaboration with the data originators and the development of numerous record selection methodologies, attribute crosswalks, decision trees, issue resolutions, and data management protocols. Common difficulties included ensuring that all records from a given originator had a unique originator feature identifier (fpbOFtrID) and determining how to crosswalk various criteria used for assessing fish passage status.
If requested, more detailed metadata on the standardization of barrier data can be provided.

Process_Date: 2009 - 2011

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Address:

Address_Type: mailing and physical address

Address: 3406 Cherry Avenue NE

City: Salem

State_or_Province: Oregon

Postal_Code: 97303

Country: United States

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) fish passage barrier data into the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) format and loaded the data into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
Metadata for ODFW barrier data states the following: This dataset contains barriers to fish passage that are known to affect and potentially affect anadromous and/or resident fish migration within the state of Oregon. The following barrier types are included: dams, culverts, falls, cascade/gradient/velocity, hatchery facility-related, tide gates, debris jams, water diversions, insufficient flow, fords, bridges and weirs. The passage status attribute describes whether a barrier feature blocks passage (complete or partial blockage), is passable or has an unknown passage status. The passage status attribute, in some cases, may not reflect the current passage status of the barrier (for culverts in particular) as conditions may have changed since the date the passage status was last evaluated. The passage status for many of the barriers is unknown due to potential effects on species and/or life stages where little information exists at this time. Consequently, many of these barriers may be completely passable to most if not all the species and life stages that have a need to migrate through the affected stream reach. The dataset includes the ODFW - ODOT jointly developed "Assessment of Road Culverts for Fish Passage Problems on State and County Owned Roads" (1999).
ODFW barrier data exist in an enterprise geodatabase consisting of multiple tables and one point feature class. The data were exported in June 2009 into a replica copy of the enterprise geodatabase where the records were manipulated. OFPBDS fields were added to the database. A crosswalk between ODFW and OFPBDS attributes and attribute values was developed. Once the crosswalk was completed, attribute values for all the point features were populated in the OFPBDS fields. The point features and attributes were then loaded into the OFPBDS geodatabase. A number of ODFW staff were consulted for the crosswalk. Agency staff were also involved in the standardization process.
Specific notes regarding the ODFW data: * The coordinate system of the spatial coordinates in the fpbLong and fpbLat fields is GCS_North_American_1983. * For the multiple features attribute (fpbMltFtr), those records with a "yes" are features which occur at multiple-feature sites AND the features are part of multiple-feature sites which have the multiple features in the OFPBDS database. The fpbMltFtr attribute was not used to indicate features belonging to multiple-feature sites unless records for the features were actually in the database. * ODFW data are linear-referenced to the 1:24,000-scale PNW Framework Hydrography. The stream identifier (fpbStrID), stream measure (fpbStrMeas) and stream name (fpbStrNm) are dervied from the framework hydrography. * Values for road name (fpbRdNm) are what was originally inputted for the ODFW data; the source of the name varies. * A value of 0 for slope (fpbSlope) is presumed to indicate a flat plane. * A value of 0 for drop (fpbDrop) is presumed to indicate no drop.
ODFW barrier data are published online at <http://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/nrimp/default.aspx?pn=fishbarrierdata>.

Process_Date: 2009

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Address:

Address_Type: mailing and physical address

Address: 3406 Cherry Avenue NE

City: Salem

State_or_Province: Oregon

Postal_Code: 97303

Country: United States

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) culvert data into the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) format and loaded the data into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
Culvert data from ODOT's Drainage Facility Management System (DFMS) were exported into XML format and provided to the Data Steward in August 2009. The data were converted into a feature class based upon the spatial coordinates of the records and added into a geodatabase where the records were manipulated. A methodology was developed to identify which of the ODOT culvert records were culverts at stream crossings. OFPBDS fields were added to the database. A crosswalk between ODOT and OFPBDS attributes and attribute values was developed. Once the crosswalk was completed, attribute values for the selected point features were populated in the OFPBDS fields. The point features and attributes were then loaded into the OFPBDS geodatabase. Several ODOT staff were consulted for the crosswalk and the record selection methodology.
Specific notes regarding the ODOT data: * The coordinate system of the spatial coordinates in the fpbLong and fpbLat fields is GCS_North_American_1983. * Features with a originator feature identifier (fpbOFtrID) beginning with "T" are temporary records and are (eventually) replaced. * Some culverts exist at multiple-feature sites. Since ODOT provided only one record per site for multiple-feature sites, the Data Steward added culvert records for these additional features. * For the multiple features attribute (fpbMltFtr), those records with a "yes" are features which occur at multiple-feature sites AND the features are part of multiple-feature sites which have the multiple features in the OFPBDS database. The fpbMltFtr attribute was not used to indicate features belonging to multiple-feature sites unless records for the features were actually in the database. * At this time, fish passage status (fpbFPasSta) is "unknown" for all ODOT records. Fish passage status for ODOT culverts is a determination made by ODFW staff; ODOT defers to ODFW for evaluating passage status. Culvert assessments by ODFW staff (in concert with ODOT staff) are in progress and will be completed as resources allow. * Values for stream name (fpbStrNm) were provided by ODOT; the source of the stream name varies. * For the road identifier (fpbRdID) and road measure (fpbRdMeas) attributes, ODOT's Highway and Milepoint attributes were used. Note that these two attributes alone are not enough to identify ODOT road features and their locations - other road attributes are needed as well. Note also that ODOT has more than one type of mileage (example: Milepoint 45 is not the same as Milepoint Z 45). fpbRdMeas is the road route measure in kilometers -- units in Milepoint were converted from miles. * A value of 0 for drop (fpbDrop) is presumed to indicate no drop.

Process_Date: 2009

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Address:

Address_Type: mailing and physical address

Address: 3406 Cherry Avenue NE

City: Salem

State_or_Province: Oregon

Postal_Code: 97303

Country: United States

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted US Bureau of Land Management (BLM) data into the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) format and loaded the data into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
Data from six BLM districts in western Oregon were incorporated: Coos Bay, Eugene, Lakeview, Medford, Roseburg, Salem. Eleven BLM datasets were separately added into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
BLM data were initially provided to the Data Steward October 2008, the geographic extents of which were typically entire BLM districts or individual resource areas. Subsequently (January - May 2009), the Data Steward obtained data from several BLM districts/resource areas, and this information was used instead of the original files. BLM data were provided in a variety of formats: GIS (shapefiles, geodatabases) and non-GIS (Access databases, Excel spreadsheets, Word documents). Tabular data (non-GIS) included both records with spatial coordinates and records without coordinates. Across BLM, there was a good level of consistency in the datasets, in terms of attributes and point collection. But, there were also substantial differences among the records, requiring that each dataset incorporated into the OFPBDS be handled individually. Not all barrier data provided to the Data Steward made it into the OFPBDS. There are three reasons for this: (a) The records are features, like cross drains (i.e., culverts not on streams), which are not on road-stream crossings. (b) The barriers are road-stream crossings not considered to be fish-bearing. (c) The datasets were provided in a non-GIS format and did not contain spatial coordinates, so the tabular information was not converted into GIS given the time constraints of the project.
The overall process for incorporating BLM data into the fish passage barrier data standard was as follows: 1. Obtain BLM data. 2. Develop a crosswalk between BLM and OFPBDS, and develop a methodology to determine which records, if not all, to include in the standard. 3. Address any issues (like unique identifiers). 4. Convert data into the standard. 5. Provide standardized data back to BLM (and often also provide Steward-modified intermediate data developed during standardization, especially where identifiers were manipulated). 6. Throughout the entire process, BLM state and district staff were consulted.
The Steward worked with the BLM data "as is". In other words, the Steward did not attempt to review, edit or 'correct' BLM records, locations or attributes. The goal was to get as much information into the standard as possible. Most BLM barrier data contain attributes which match those in the standard as well as attributes which do not exist in the standard.
Throughout the process of converting BLM data into the OFPBDS, a series of determinations, assumptions and decisions were made. A BLM - OFPBDS Crosswalk (spreadsheet) was developed and contains a record of this, along with a document detailing key GIS steps in the conversion process.
In order to standardize the data, crosswalks of each BLM dataset were developed to ensure that attributes and attribute values were properly matched. The crosswalk details how barriers were converted into the OFPBDS format. Two issues highlight the difficulty in integrating the data: unique identifiers (IDs); standardizing attribute values for fish passage status.
There were several problems related to BLM records containing unique originator identifiers (IDs): a. There was not a consistent, unique identifier for barrier records among BLM districts and resource areas. b. Some BLM datasets did not contain any ID at all. c. Some BLM datasets contained records with duplicated IDs. To address these problems, the Steward developed a system whereby a prefix (e.g., "BLMMed" for BLM - Medford District) was added to the ID provided by BLM, or if there was no unqiue ID, the ID was modified or generated by the Steward.
As for fish passage status, the OFPBDS considers barriers to be Blocked (not passable), Partial (partially passable), Passable, or Unknown. Where passage status was indicated, BLM data utilized several criteria/definitions: a. professional judgment, b. culvert design criteria, c. coarse screen filter (Green, Grey, Red). Crosswalking passage status can be problematic; for example, should a Red culvert be considered Blocked or Partial in the standard? (It was decided to categorize Red barriers as Blocked.)
Specific notes regarding the BLM data (for all source datasets): * The coordinate system of the spatial coordinates in the fpbLong and fpbLat fields is GCS_North_American_1983. * Most BLM datasets included BLM and non-BLM 'culverts', especially private barriers. * Values for road name (fpbRdNm) were provided by BLM, and tended to reflect BLM's internal road IDs. * Values for stream name (fpbStrNm) were provided by BLM; the source of the stream name varies.
Specific notes regarding the BLM data (for one - or more - source datasets): * For fish passage status (fpbFPasSta), some BLM datasets utilized a BLM coarse filter to assess passage status while other BLM datasets utilized culvert design specifications ('Fish Pass'). The following represents how these attribute values were crosswalked to the OFPBDS values:
BLM Coarse Filter OFPBDS Green Passable Grey Unknown Red Blocked
BLM 'Fish Pass' OFPBDS Yes Passable No Blocked

Process_Date: 2009

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Address:

Address_Type: mailing and physical address

Address: 3406 Cherry Avenue NE

City: Salem

State_or_Province: Oregon

Postal_Code: 97303

Country: United States

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Reconciled barrier features duplicated in the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) geodatabase.
Duplication Analysis Phase The Duplication Analysis phase consists of a set of procedures to determine if duplication exists between the targeted data and the OFPBDS. The Duplication Analysis occurs after the crosswalk methodology is approved, and the data is converted accordingly. Proximity is the most effective indicator in determining duplication, followed by a thorough, manual quality assurance review by GIS Analyst that considers attribute values and other factors such as data currency and completeness of the source datasets. The Duplication Analysis processing steps are as follows: 1) Build a Workstation (MXD): Using ArcMap, create a MXD (Map document) to house all of the data necessary to perform the Duplication Analysis. A group of datasets are required for the proximity analysis (model), and manual analysis (basemap data). a) Model Datasets: The three datasets required to run the duplication analysis model include: (1) Targeted Barriers, (2) OFPBDS, and a (3) Study Area. The targeted barriers are barriers of interest scheduled to be added to the standard, and the OFPBDS is the most recent updated version of the standard. The Study area is a polygon file that completely surrounds the targeted barriers, and can either be generated from hydrologic unit codes, or any boundary data that encompasses all targeted barriers. It is recommended to make addition modifications to the study area to tightly encompass the targeted barriers. b) Manual Datasets: The datasets instrumental in the manual analysis include: Streams (complete watercourse layer), roads (combination of BLM highways and roads), Image Web Server (Oregon Explorer), ESRI Topography (ESRI Map Server), ESRI Imagery World 2D (ESRI Map Server). These basemap datasets assist in determining apparent or ‘potential’ barrier locations. For instance, the barriers of concern for these efforts are on fish bearing streams, and in most cases, at the intersections of roads and streams. The two sets of satellite imagery shares a number of aerial indicators including: roads, streams, drainages, pools, linear vegetation indicating streams, infrastructure, and even the barriers themselves. The Topography layer helps identify slope, aspect, drainages, infrastructure, streams, roads and elevation. All together, these datasets present a strong representation of where barriers are ‘most likely’ located.
2) Run the Model: The Duplication Analysis Model (DAM) is designed to assist in the identification of duplication between barriers scheduled for integration in to the OFPBDS, and barriers that already exist in the OFPBDS. The primary goal of DAM is to distinguish between unlikely and potential duplicates in the Targeted Barriers. The unlikely duplicate barriers will be directly integrated in to the OFPBDS; where as the potential duplicates will require further investigation and analysis.
a) DAM Parameters: There are three model parameters necessary to execute DAM indicated by a blue oval. These parameters include the Targeted Barriers, the OFPBDS dataset, and the custom Study Area. b) Model Assumptions / Limitations: The DAM does pose some limitations and assumptions that need to be addressed. 1) Assumption 1: DAM classifies duplicates automatically as a standalone tool. DAM is not the sole tool to identify duplication; its intention is to assist the GIS Analyst in the Duplication Analysis Process by providing a platform for further analysis with enhanced capabilities (filtered datasets, UIDs, relationship and connectivity potential, and distance measurements). 2) Assumption 2: The datasets (OFPBDS & Target Barriers) are geographically accurate. There may be unique instances where barrier features are not accurate, resulting in a false duplicate, or no duplicate at all. The Analyst Duplication Assessment will legitimize these features based upon attribute comparison, if their identified as a duplicate feature. 3) Assumption 3: The closest feature from the Target Barrier is a duplicate. In some cases, there is a duplicate, while in others there may not be. If there is a duplicate, it’s not always the closest barrier. The Model was designed to accommodate this situation, by clipping all features within 150 meters of the features as a base to run the Near Analysis. The Analyst Duplication Assessment would pick up these instances based on attribute comparison, geospatial patterns, and remote sensing using the available base map data. 4) Limitation 1: Horizontal accuracy of a feature needs to be taken in to account when comparing potential duplicates. For instance, the location accuracy of a feature may be outside of the established potential duplication range of 150 meters. 5) Limitation 2: Potential duplication is derived entirely geospatially using proximity. It does not account for similar or disparate descriptive attribute data to determine potential duplication. c) DAM Operations: There are four geospatial operations within DAM indicated by yellow boxes. First, DAM clips the OFPBDS features to the Study Area (clip). This provides a comprehensive OFPBDS copy to examine in future analysis. Next, DAM designates a 150 meter buffer around the Target Barriers (buffer), and clips the OFPBDS barriers to this buffer layer (clip 2), which results in an OFPBDS_Clipped dataset with only OFPBDS features within 150 meters of the Target Barriers. Finally, DAM performs an analysis on the Target_Barriers by calculating their distance from the closest OFPBDS_Improve barriers (near), and its corresponding ObjectID. The distance and ObjectID are added to two fields in the Target_Barriers. Note* The OFPBDS_Clipped dataset’s name will change to OFPBDS_Improve. This dataset will be used to improve duplicate features which reside in the OFPBDS if more comprehensive or accurate data is available. d) DAM Results: Two significant datasets are produced by DAM that requires further investigation. One is the OFPBDS_Improve, and the second is a revised Target_Barriers. Again, the OFPBDS_Improve dataset are OFPBDS features within 150 meters of the Target_Barriers. The OFPBDS_Improve is a direct result of the second clip operation in DAM. The revised Target_Barriers is the original Target_Barriers layer, although has two new fields added in the attribute table; one is named NEAR_FID, and the other NEAR_DIST. The NEAR_FID houses the ObjectID of the corresponding feature in the OFPBDS. Potentially, the tables can now be internally linked using the Object_ID field in OFPBDS_Improve, and the NEAR_FID field in the Target Barriers. This link may support relationship classes, joins, and several relate functions which can be applied for further evaluation in the manual analyst review. The OFPBDS_Improve dataset will be set aside for further analysis in the manual review. The Target_Barrier dataset can be delineated in to two subtypes. Features inside the 150 meter buffer will be extracted to a subsequent dataset called Potential_Duplicates. Features outside of the buffers range are extracted to a Barrier Final dataset, and set to be integrated to the OFPBDS.
3) Analyst Duplication Assessment: The Analyst Duplication Assessment is designed to physically sift through the Potential Barriers manually and compare their attributes to that of the OFPBDS_Improve. During this stage, it’s imperative to utilize professional judgment, while at all times protecting the integrity of the OFPBDS. The initial approach is to compare these datasets by their proximity to one another, and their descriptive barrier attributes. The Potential_Duplicates dataset is the primary dataset for evaluation in this assessment. a) Data Preparation: Using the workstation set forth in the first process, three main barrier datasets need to be added, and one created. These include the OFPBDS_Improve, Barriers_Final, and Potential_Duplication. An additional empty dataset called Questionable_Duplicates is also needed to house questionable barriers. b) Analyze Barriers: Two primary barrier datasets are necessary at this stage to identify duplication. They include the Apparent_Duplicates and OFPBDS_Improve datasets. By comparing these datasets by their proximity to one another, surrounding infrastructure, topography, vegetation, barrier measurements, hydrology, landscape, road/stream intersections, and remote sensing, a GIS Analyst can determine with a fair amount of certainty whether duplication exists. A document entitled, “Reconciling Duplicated barrier Features among Data Sources in the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard” provides some assistance in this process. c) Decision Results: Three actions result from this process, which all derive from the Potential_Duplicates dataset. 1. Duplication is Determined = Data is placed in an Apparent_Duplicate dataset, and set aside for further analysis when comparing the datasets already established in the OFPBDS (OFPBDS_Improve). Refer to the section d of this process. 2. Duplication is Questionable = Record is cut and pasted to the Questionable_Duplicate dataset. (Corresponding Record is removed from OFPBDS_Improve) The Questionable_Duplicate dataset is provided back to their origin source for further analysis. 3. Barrier is Unique = Record is cut and pasted to the Target_Finals. (Corresponding Record is removed from OFPBDS_Improve) The Target_Finals are integrated to the OFPBDS directly upon completion. d) Update OFPBDS: The approach is to improve upon existing data residing in the OFPBDS. If duplication has been determined through the Apparent_Duplicate dataset, the attributes are compared to their corresponding barrier in the OFPBDS. If data is superior in the Apparent_Duplicates dataset, then the corresponding OFPBDS_Improve data is improved with the enhanced data. For example, if data is missing in the OFPBDS, and present from the Target barriers, the attributes in the Target Barriers are integrated to the OFPBDS. In addition, if data has been updated, such as the fish passage status (fpbFPasSta) from a previous assessment, the more current attribute data is utilized.

Process_Date: 2009 - 2011

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Address:

Address_Type: mailing and physical address

Address: 3406 Cherry Avenue NE

City: Salem

State_or_Province: Oregon

Postal_Code: 97303

Country: United States

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Reconciled barrier features in the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) with project information from the Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory (OWRI) maintained by the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB).
OWRI Reconciliation Process
Use the most recent OWRI data. This geodatabase contains two feature classes: the full OWRI database and a subset feature class, fish_passage_projects, consisting of only the fish passage barrier improvement projects. The fish_passage_projects feature class constitutes records where the Project Type field = “fish passage” or “combined”; the Treatment field describes fish passage barrier modifications, replacement or removal, and Comment or Description fields mention fish passage, culverts, bridges, and/or dams.
1. Add the fish_passage_projects feature class to your MXD along with the OFPBDS version you are editing.
2. Do a Select by Location using the fish_passage_projects features and the OFPBDS features, within a distance of 150 meters. The selected OWRI points are now used for manual reconciliation.
3. Use the treatment field or TreatmentLUID field to divide the projects into three categories: Removed barriers, replaced barriers and modified barriers. Information regarding the projects is also available in the description and comment fields, and should be consulted if there is a question about what happened where.
There may be cases where a barrier in your original data is the replaced or modified culvert that is recorded in the OWRI.
1. First, consider the date of the original data [fpbLocDt and fpbStaEvDt] in comparison to OWRI project dates [CompleteYear and CompleteMonth].
2. Second, check the Fish Passage Status [fpbFPasSta]. A “Completely Passable” status in the original data would point toward a newer, possibly replaced or modified structure.
3. If it is determined that the original barrier feature and the OWRI feature are the same, only the fpbOrYr (if null) or fpbModDt (if applicable) fields would be populated from the OWRI record.
Removed Barriers
If the barrier was removed and not replaced, fill in the fpbRmvDt field in the OFPBDS data with the CompleteYear and CompleteMonth fields from OWRI. Following OFPBDS Business Rules: Data originators should populate these date elements as completely as possible. However, partial date information will be accepted. If the month and year are known, use zeros to populate the day portion of the date element. If only the year is known, use zeros to populate the month and day portion of the date element. If the date is unknown, use zeros to populate the entire element (e.g. 20011200, 20010000, 00000000).
Replaced Barriers
If the barrier was replaced with a new culvert, bridge, etc. there are two steps: Original OFPBDS feature is updated with the removed date, fpbRmvDt. A new feature is created for the new culvert, bridge, etc. and attribute data is copied and changed.
1. Select and Copy the original OFPBDS feature, and then Paste (Add) it to the appropriate feature class. You now have duplicate features.
2. Update the original record’s fpbRmvDt field: fpbRmvDt = CompleteYear and CompleteMonth fields per OWRI, following OFPBDS Business Rules, i.e., “20071000”.
3. Change attribute data for the new (copied) feature: a. fpbOFtrID and fpbOSiteID new features use the Site ID number (if available) or the OWEB Project Number if there is no SiteID number. If there is more than one feature for a Project, add a suffix, i.e., -A, -B for multiple features. b. fpbONm = “OWEB” c. fpbFPasSta = “Passable” d. fpbStaEvDt = CompleteYear and CompleteMonth fields per OWRI, following OFPBDS Business Rules. e. fpbStaEvMd = ”ByDesign” f. fpbOrYr = CompleteYear field per OWRI g. fpbFtrTy or fpbFtrNm if relevant, i.e. culvert replaced with bridge. h. Delete (make null) or update old information, copied from the original record, that is not related to the new feature, i.e. culvert subtype, height, length, width, slope, drop, and any other pertinent fields. i. Note: If you copied an OFPBDS feature that already has a fpbFtrID and fpbSiteID, these will need to be deleted (made null) and the Data Steward will assign new IDs.
Modified Barriers
If the barrier was modified, retrofitted, or improved in some manner, several fields in the OFPBDS records will be updated and the fields fpbModTy and/or fpbModDesc, in the version1_fields Table will be completed.
1. fpbModDt = CompleteYear and CompleteMonth field information from OWRI, following Business Rules for Dates. 2. fpbFPasSta = “Passable” Note: many modifications may only moderately improve passage; i.e., an upgrade from Blocked to Partial; so check OWRI comment fields or consider biologist verification if there is a question. 3. fpbStaEvDt = CompleteYear and CompleteMonth fields per OWRI, following Business Rules. 4. fpbStaEvMd = ”ByDesign” 5. fpbPasONm = “OWEB” 6. Populate the fbpModTy and/or fpbModDesc fields as appropriate: Baffles, StreamSim, Weirs, Other, Unknown. If “Other”, describe in the fpbModDes field. This might entail copying information from the OWRI comments or description fields.
Issues with OWRI data
- In cases where multiple passage barrier features were addressed as part of a single restoration project, especially where different types of features were addressed, it may be unclear which point represents which feature.
- A large number of OWRI passage project locations have poor positional accuracy, in particular with records created with the StreamNet Event Mapper (~2005 or earlier). This issue hinders reconciliation with OFPBD, but it likely accounts for only a small percentage of the mismatches between OWRI and the current OFPBDS. OWRI records with a location confidence rating of “high” match up with OFPBD at the same rate (~15-20%) as those records with medium and low location confidence ratings.
- All OWRI passage project records should be incorporated into OFPBD at a later date to maximize its comprehensiveness. There are numerous records in OWRI that are unlikely to be submitted to OFPBD by their ultimate originators because they fall on private industrial and private non-industrial forestlands. Incorporating OWRI records into OFPBD will update the database on passage problems already addressed.
- Rules and assumptions for populating required attributes such as passage status (e.g. all OWRI passage projects now pass fish) will need to be developed when OWRI feature points are incorporated into the OFPBDS data.

Process_Date: 2009 - 2011

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Address:

Address_Type: mailing and physical address

Address: 3406 Cherry Avenue NE

City: Salem

State_or_Province: Oregon

Postal_Code: 97303

Country: United States

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted Oregon Water Resources Department Dam Inventory data into the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) format and loaded the data into the OFPBDS geodatabase. Metadata for OWRD dam data states the following: dams within the jurisdiction of Oregon Water Resource Department are defined by a dam height >= 10 feet and storage of >= 9.2 acre feet.
OWRD dam data exist in an enterprise geodatabase as a point feature class, updated in June 2010, and a SQL database with ongoing updates. A geodatabase with a point feature class and an Excel Spreadsheet of 318 additional dams, were provided to the Data Steward in June and July 2010 respectively. A feature class was created for the Excel spreadsheet records by importing the spatial coordinates through ArcGIS. The two feature classes were checked for record duplication and then merged.
A crosswalk between OWRD and OFPBDS attributes and attribute values was developed. Additionally, a methodology was developed to identify OWRD dam records that were not located in stream channels, i.e. waste water lagoons, and therefore not a fish passage barrier. OWRD staff was consulted for the crosswalk and the record selection methodology. Once the crosswalk was completed, OFPBDS fields were added to the database and attribute values for all the point features were populated in the OFPBDS fields.
The data were exported in July 2010 into a replica copy of the enterprise geodatabase. Once the dam features were loaded in the OFPBDS replica, the data were analyzed for duplication. Where OWRD features were duplicates of OFPBDS (version 1) features, the OWRD dam feature replaced the OFPBDS (version 1) dam feature.
Spatial proximity along with attribute similarity was used to identify potential - and likely - duplicates. The threshold distance default was 150 meters. However, upon visual inspection of the distance between OWRD and OFPBDS (version 1) dam features with matching attribute characteristics, some were over 2,000 feet apart. Potential duplicates, based on spatial proximity, were manually reviewed to identify those which were actual (confirmed) duplicates. Features which were potential duplicates due to proximity were compared by key attributes: Dam name, stream name, dam height, and owner. If there was still a question regarding duplication after this comparison, OWRD's water rights database was queried.
Because OWRD does not collect information on fish passage status, where there was a definitive match between an OWRD dam record and an OFPBDS (version 1) dam feature with barrier status and fishway information, that attribute information was merged from the OFPBDS record to the OWRD record in order to retain it. ODFW is noted as the data source for those fields (fpbFPasONm). A second manual review based on feature name similarity further identified actual duplicates where feature points were greater than 150 meters apart. Dam features removed from the OFPBDS (version 1) database were ODFW records.
Once the barrier features were compiled in the OFPBDS database and once features were analyzed for duplication, a limited effort was made to update dam features based upon the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board's (OWEB) Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory (OWRI). The point features and attributes were then loaded into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
Specific notes regarding the OWRD dam data:
* The coordinate system of the spatial coordinates in the fpbLong and fpbLat fields is GCS_North_American_1983.
*The passage status for many of the dams is unknown at this time. Consequently, some of these barriers may be completely passable to most if not all the species and life stages that have a need to migrate through the affected stream reach.
*Because OWRD does not collect information on fish passage status, where there was a definitive match between an OWRD dam record and an OFPBDS (version 1) dam feature with barrier status and fishway information, that attribute information was merged from the OFPBDS record to the OWRD record in order to retain it. ODFW is noted as the data source for those fields (fpbFPasONm).
*Values for stream name (fpbStrNm) were provided by OWRD and are generally the storage water source as stated on the OWRD permit, not the location of the dam relative to a stream channel.
* Where there is stream identifier (fpbStrID), and/or stream measure (fpbStrMeas) data are linear-referenced to the 1:24,000-scale PNW Framework Hydrography.

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted Oregon Department of Forestry - Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODF-ODFW) Fish Presence barrier data into the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) format and loaded the data into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
ODF-ODFW Fish Presence barrier data consists of two data sets: attributed line features in an ODF Fish Presence geodatabase, last updated in June, 2010, and an Access database of culvert specifics, with location coordinates, taken from ODF-ODFW Fish Presence survey forms, compiled in 2000-2001 by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. A process for deriving barrier feature points from the ODF line features and a conversion outline, or crosswalk, between the Fish Presence line data, Fish Presence culvert database, and OFPBDS attributes and attribute values was developed. ODF and ODFW staff who compiled the Fish Presence data was consulted regarding the crosswalk. OFPBDS fields were then added to the ODF-ODFW Fish Presence barrier feature tables and attribute values were populated in the OFPBDS fields.
ODF-ODFW Fish Presence barrier data was then analyzed for duplication between the two data sets and with OFPBDS records. Where ODF Fish Presence line feature derived barrier records were duplicates of Fish Presence culvert survey features, the line feature derived barrier was deleted. Where ODF-ODFW Fish Presence barrier features were duplicates of OFPBDS features, the ODF-ODFW Fish Presence barrier features were not added to the OFPBDS geodatabase. Where there was a definitive match between features, absent attribute information was migrated from the ODF-ODFW record to the OFPBDS feature in order to retain it. ODF-ODFW is noted as the data source for those fields.
Spatial proximity along with attribute similarity was used to identify potential - and likely - duplicates. The threshold distance default was 150 meters. Points greater than 150 meters from a current OFPBDS feature location were considered new features and added. Features within 150 meters of OFPBDS features were considered potential duplicates, based on spatial proximity. Features which were potential duplicates due to proximity were compared by key attributes: stream name, road name, culvert type, width and length. If there was still a question regarding duplication after this comparison, the feature was put aside in a separate feature class for consultation.
ODF-ODFW Fish Presence barrier features were also analyzed for duplication with the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board's (OWEB) Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory (OWRI). Where a match could be made between an OWRI record and an ODF-ODFW Fish Presence barrier feature, updates were made to pertinent fields.
In October 2010, the ODF-ODFW Fish Presence barrier data were loaded into the OFPBDS enterprise geodatabase.
Specific notes regarding the ODF-ODFW Fish Presence barrier feature data:
* The coordinate system of the spatial coordinates in the fpbLong and fpbLat fields is GCS_North_American_1983.
* The ODF Fish Presence feature class is attributed line features for watercourses within the state. The table contains a Barrier field to identify stream segments impacted by the presence of a fish barrier. To derive point features, ODFW selected records with a Barrier field value other than null or "None." Points were generated from the selected record lines [Barrier field value other than null or none] with the Feature Vertices to Points script/toolbox for line segments. Line segments above a barrier feature all carry the same barrier attribute; therefore upstream vertices need to be discarded. Arc direction varied in the feature class, so vertices (points) were checked manually against Fish Presence line work to identify the downstream terminus or point between stream segments with a barrier value other than null or none and segments with a none or null value. Line attributes transferred to the point.
* ODF-ODFW Fish Presence survey data sources are varied, but are primarily Oregon Department of Forestry, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Federal land management agencies, private forest land owners, and private forestry consultants. Fish passage status evaluations are based on the ODF/ODFW Fish Presence Survey protocol described in Surveying Forest Streams for Fish Use.
*Passage status for some barriers is unknown at this time. Consequently, some of these barriers may be completely passable to most if not all the species and life stages that have a need to migrate through the affected stream reach.
* ODF Fish Presence data exists on hydrographic line work from several sources, including manually digitized watercourses. Where there is a stream identifier (fpbStrID), and/or stream measure (fpbStrMeas) data are linear-referenced to the 1:24,000-scale PNW Framework Hydrography.
ODF Fish Presence data is available online: <http://www.oregon.gov/ODF/GIS/fishpresence.shtml>

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Hours_of_Service: 7:30-4

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Aquatic Inventories Project (AIP) Habitat Unit data into the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) format and loaded the data into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
The ODFW Aquatic Inventories Project Habitat Unit data exists in ArcInfo Coverages packaged as Arc interchange files (.e00), last updated in 2010. Downloaded interchange files were imported into coverages in ArcCatalog, and then converted to geodatabase feature classes.
A process for deriving barrier feature points from the AIP Habitat Unit line features and a crosswalk between the AIP Habitat Unit line data and OFPBDS attributes and attribute values was developed. ODFW staff, who compile the AIP Habitat Unit data, was consulted regarding deriving features and the crosswalk. OFPBDS fields were then added to the AIP Habitat Unit barrier feature tables and attribute values were populated in the OFPBDS fields.
AIP Habitat Unit barrier data was then analyzed for duplication with OFPBDS records. Where AIP Habitat Unit line feature derived barrier records were duplicates of OFPBDS features, the AIP Habitat Unit barrier features were not added to the OFPBDS geodatabase. Where there was a definitive match between features, absent attribute information was migrated from the AIP Habitat Unit record to the OFPBDS feature in order to retain it. ODFW is noted as the data source for those fields.
Spatial proximity along with attribute similarity was used to identify potential - and likely - duplicates. The threshold distance default was 150 meters. Points greater than 150 meters from a current OFPBDS feature location were considered new features and added. Features within 150 meters of OFPBDS features were considered potential duplicates, based on spatial proximity. Features which were potential duplicates due to proximity were compared by key attributes: feature type, stream name, road name, height, width and length.
AIP Habitat Unit barrier features were also analyzed for duplication with the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board's (OWEB) Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory (OWRI). Where a match could be made between an OWRI record and an AIP Habitat Unit barrier feature, updates were made to pertinent fields.
In February 2011, the AIP Habitat Unit barrier data were loaded into the OFPBDS enterprise geodatabase.
Specific notes regarding the AIP Habitat Unit barrier feature data:
* The coordinate system of the spatial coordinates in the fpbLong and fpbLat fields is GCS_North_American_1983.
* The AIP Habitat Unit feature class is attributed line features for surveyed watercourses within the state. The geodatabase table contains a Unit Type field that identifies culvert crossings, artificial step structures and natural bedrock step features, i.e. waterfalls, along with a unique identifier field (HABUNT). To derive point barrier features, ODFW selected records with a Unit Type field value equal to these unit types [culvert crossings, steps created by structures, natural bedrock steps greater than 2 meters]. The Comment Code and Note fields also identified features such as dams, fish ladders and road fords. Points were generated from the selected record lines with the Feature Vertices to Points script/toolbox for line segments, using the start point of the line. Line attributes transferred to the point.
*Fish passage status evaluations are based on coarse passage criteria relative to the feature type. For culverts, a drop or perch height over 0.5 feet = Partial; if the drop is equal to or greater than one foot, then a two foot or greater unit depth is needed immediately downstream (jump pool). If the downstream unit depth is equal to or greater than two feet, then the Fish Passage Status remains as "Partial". If the downstream unit depth is less than two feet, the Fish Passage Status = Blocked. If the slope of a culvert > 5% = Partial; if the drop > 3.2 feet = Blocked .
For dams and other artificial step structures - if the Height > 0.5 foot = Partial; Height > 6.6 feet = Blocked; If the height is equal to or greater than one foot, then a two foot or greater unit depth is needed immediately downstream (jump pool). If the downstream unit depth is equal to or greater than two feet, then the Fish Passage Status remains as "Partial". If the downstream unit depth is less than two feet, the Fish Passage Status = Blocked. For natural features if the height is over 16 feet = Blocked. If the height is less than 16 feet = Unknown; if the slope is greater than or equal to 16 % over a distance of 200 meters = Blocked.
Passage status for some barriers is unknown at this time. Consequently, some of these barriers may be completely passable to most if not all the species and life stages that have a need to migrate through the affected stream reach.
* Project survey dates range from 1990 to 2009. Where data was seasonal, winter data was not used.
* AIP Habitat Unit data exists on hydrographic line work generally at a scale of 1:100,000. Where there is a stream identifier (fpbStrID), and/or stream measure (fpbStrMeas) data are linear-referenced to the 1:24,000-scale PNW Framework Hydrography.
AIP Habitat Unit data is available online: <http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ODFW/freshwater/inventory/habitgis.html>

Process_Date: 2010 - 2011

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted from the Umpqua Basin Fish Access Team (UBFAT) fish passage data into the Oregon fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS). Geospatial and tabular data was provided by UBFAT, as well as a document entitled "Umpqua Basin Fish Access Team (UBFAT) Basin Plan."
The overall process for incorporating the UBFAT data into the fish passage barrier data standard was as follows: 1. Obtain UBFAT data. 2. Develop a crosswalk between UBFAT and OFPBDS, and develop a methodology to determine which records, if not all, to include in the standard. 3. Address any issues (like unique identifiers). 4. Convert data into the standard. 5. Provide standardized data back to UBFAT (and often also provide Steward-modified intermediate data developed during standardization, especially where identifiers were manipulated). 6. Throughout the entire process, UBFAT were consulted. The Steward worked with the UBFAT data "as is". In other words, the Steward did not attempt to review, edit or 'correct' UBFAT records, locations or attributes. The goal was to get as much information into the standard as possible. Most UBFAT barrier data contain attributes which match those in the standard as well as attributes which do not exist in the standard. Throughout the process of converting UBFAT data into the OFPBDS, a series of determinations, assumptions and decisions were made. A UBFAT - OFPBDS Crosswalk (spreadsheet) was developed and contains a record of this, along with a document detailing key GIS steps in the conversion process.
A duplication process was performed as the final stage of analysis and documented within the UBFAT crosswalk to determine what, if any UBFAT barriers were duplicates of pre-existing OFPBDS barriers. Using a duplication analysis model to identify potential duplicates within 150 meters, 838 of the 2242 barriers were classified as potential duplicates. Out of the 838 potential duplicates, 650 were apparent duplicates, while the remaining 188 were questionable. The 650 apparent duplicate barriers were then used to update or improve missing or erroneous data in the corresponding OFPBDS features.
The entire integration process using UBFAT's fish passage barrier information resulted in 369 bridges, 1,211 culverts, 1 dams, and 11 waterfalls. The total of fish passage barrier features imported to the OFPBDS from UBFAT is 1,592 features.

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Hours_of_Service: 7:30 - 4

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted Rogue Basin Fish Access Team (RBFAT) data into the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) format and loaded the data into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
The RBFAT data exists in an Excel spreadsheet and an Access database, last updated in 2005. Spatial coordinates for RBFAT barrier features were not available, with the exception of the Bear Creek Watershed. RBFAT data for the Bear Creek Watershed exists in a point feature class shapefile. RBFAT features with no spatial coordinates were manually located on DRGs or imagery and digitized, referring to legal coordinates, river miles, and ownership in the spreadsheet and database, and Oregon Water Resources Point of Diversion database and Decree map information.
A conversion outline, or crosswalk, between RBFAT and OFPBDS attributes and attribute values was developed. RBFAT members who compiled the data were consulted regarding the crosswalk. OFPBDS fields were added to the Bear Creek Watershed geodatabase and attribute values were populated in the OFPBDS fields. Bear Creek Watershed records were then loaded into the RBFAT geodatabase. The RBFAT geodatabase and RBFAT Access tables were joined on the BarrierID field and attribute values were populated in the OFPBDS fields.
RBFAT data was then analyzed for duplication with OFPBDS records. Where RBFAT features were duplicates of OFPBDS features, the RBFAT features were not added to the OFPBDS geodatabase. Spatial proximity along with attribute similarity was used to identify potential - and likely - duplicates. The threshold distance default was 150 meters. Points greater than 150 meters from a current OFPBDS feature location were considered new features and added. Features within 150 meters of OFPBDS features were considered potential duplicates, based on spatial proximity. Features which were potential duplicates due to proximity were compared by key attributes: stream name, road name, culvert type, width and length. If there was still a question regarding duplication after this comparison, the feature was put aside in a separate feature class for consultation.
Where there was a definitive match between a RBFAT feature and an OFPBDS feature, missing attribute information was merged from the RBFAT record to the OFPBDS record in order to retain it. RBFAT is noted as the data source for those fields.
RBFAT barrier features were also analyzed for duplication with the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board's (OWEB) Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory (OWRI). Where a match could be made between an OWRI record and a RBFAT feature, updates were made to pertinent fields.
The RBFAT data were exported in October 2010 into a replica copy of the enterprise geodatabase and posted to the OFPBDS enterprise geodatabase.




Specific notes regarding the RBFAT data:
* The coordinate system of the spatial coordinates in the fpbLong and fpbLat fields is GCS_North_American_1983.
* Where there is stream identifier (fpbStrID), and/or stream measure (fpbStrMeas) data are linear-referenced to the 1:24,000-scale PNW Framework Hydrography.
RBFAT fish passage barrier data is available online: <http://www.restoretherogue.org/docs/rbfat_barrier_prioritization92703.xls>

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted Benton County's fish passage data into the Oregon fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS). Geospatial and tabular data was provided by BENTON COUNTY, as well as a document entitled "A comprehensive Assessment of Fish Passage Barriers in the Scappoose Bay Watershed."
The overall process for incorporating Benton County's data into the fish passage barrier data standard was as follows: 1. Obtain Benton County data. 2. Develop a crosswalk between Benton County and OFPBDS, and develop a methodology to determine which records, if not all, to include in the standard. 3. Address any issues (like unique identifiers). 4. Convert data into the standard. 5. Provide standardized data back to Benton County (and often also provide Steward-modified intermediate data developed during standardization, especially where identifiers were manipulated). 6. Throughout the entire process, Benton County was consulted. The Steward worked with the Benton County data "as is". In other words, the Steward did not attempt to review, edit or 'correct' Benton County records, locations or attributes. The goal was to get as much information into the standard as possible. Most Benton County barrier data contain attributes which match those in the standard as well as attributes which do not exist in the standard. Throughout the process of converting Benton County data into the OFPBDS, a series of determinations, assumptions and decisions were made. A Benton County - OFPBDS Crosswalk (spreadsheet) was developed and contains a record of this, along with a document detailing key GIS steps in the conversion process.
A duplication process was performed as the final stage of analysis and documented within the Benton County crosswalk to determine what, if any Benton County barriers were duplicates of pre-existing OFPBDS barriers. Using a duplication analysis model to identify potential duplicates within 150 meters, 93 of the 571 barriers were classified as potential duplicates. Out of the 93 potential duplicates, 60 were apparent duplicates, while the remaining 33 were questionable. The 60 apparent duplicate barriers were then used to update or improve missing or erroneous data in the corresponding OFPBDS features.
The entire integration process using Benton County's fish passage barrier information resulted in 224 bridges, 2 cascades, 219 culverts, 5 dams, 4 waterfalls, 2 fords, 1 weir, 4 other known fish passage barrier feature including debris jams, and 13 unknown features. The total of fish passage barrier features imported to the OFPBDS from Benton County is 474 features.

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier inventory data into the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) format and loaded the data into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier data exists in an Excel spreadsheet, last updated in 2007. A conversion outline, or crosswalk, between Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce and OFPBDS attributes and attribute values was developed. Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce staff who compiled the data was consulted regarding the crosswalk. OFPBDS fields were then added to the Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier database and attribute values for all the point features were populated in the OFPBDS fields.
The Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier data was then analyzed for duplication with the OFPBDS (version 1) records. Where Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier features were duplicates of OFPBDS (version 1) features, the Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier feature replaced the OFPBDS (version 1) feature.
Spatial proximity along with attribute similarity was used to identify potential - and likely - duplicates. The threshold distance default was 150 meters. Points greater than 150 meters from a current OFPBDS (version 1) feature location were considered new features and added. Features within 150 meters of OFPBDS (version 1) features were considered potential duplicates, based on spatial proximity. Features which were potential duplicates due to proximity were compared by key attributes: stream name, road name, feature type and subtype.
Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier features were also analyzed for duplication with the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board's (OWEB) Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory (OWRI). Where a match could be made between an OWRI record and a Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier feature, updates were made to pertinent fields.
The Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier data were exported in September 2010 into a replica copy of the enterprise geodatabase and posted to the OFPBDS enterprise geodatabase.
Specific notes regarding the Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier data:
* The coordinate system of the spatial coordinates in the fpbLong and fpbLat fields is GCS_North_American_1983.
*The Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier inventory used a U.S. Forest Service/BLM Full Assessment protocol, which includes both barrier and hydraulic analysis, to evaluate fish passage status. This protocol may result in a high number of passage status evaluations = blocked. For information on the protocol, refer to Explanations and Instructions for Passage Through Road/Stream Crossings Inventory Form (Jacobson 2003) and Region 1 Fish Passage Evaluation Criteria (Jacobson 2003).
* Where there is stream identifier (fpbStrID), and/or stream measure (fpbStrMeas) data are linear-referenced to the 1:24,000-scale PNW Framework Hydrography. Wallowa County BPA/Nez Perce fish barrier features information is available online at BPA Streamnet Data Store (BPA Project No. 2002-073-00).

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted Washington County fish passage assessment culvert data into the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) format and loaded the data into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
The Washington County culvert data exists in an Excel spreadsheet, last updated in 2006 for the Dairy Creek watershed and in 2008 for the Gales Creek Watershed. A conversion outline, or crosswalk, between Washington County and OFPBDS attributes and attribute values was developed. Washington County staff who compiled the data was consulted regarding the crosswalk. OFPBDS fields were then added to the Washington County records and attribute values for all barrier features were populated in the OFPBDS fields.
Washington County data was then analyzed for duplication with the OFPBDS records. Where Washington County fish barrier features were duplicates of OFPBDS features, the Washington County fish barrier feature replaced the OFPBDS feature.
Spatial proximity along with attribute similarity was used to identify potential - and likely - duplicates. The threshold distance default was 150 meters. Points greater than 150 meters from a current OFPBDS feature location were considered new features and added. Features within 150 meters of OFPBDS (version 1) features were considered potential duplicates, based on spatial proximity. Features which were potential duplicates due to proximity were compared by key attributes: stream name, road name, culvert type, width and length. If there was still a question regarding duplication after this comparison, the feature was put aside in a separate feature class for consultation.
Washington County barrier features were also analyzed for duplication with the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board's (OWEB) Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory (OWRI). Where a match could be made between an OWRI record and a Washington County feature, updates were made to pertinent fields.
The Washington County data were exported in October 2010 into a replica copy of the enterprise geodatabase and posted to the OFPBDS enterprise geodatabase.
Specific notes regarding the Washington County fish passage culvert data:
* The coordinate system of the spatial coordinates in the fpbLong and fpbLat fields is GCS_North_American_1983.
* Culverts smaller than 15 inches in diameter were excluded from the Washington County fish passage assessment as were culverts carrying streams with gradients over 15%.
* The culvert survey measured four surrogate indicators to determine a culvert's ability to pass fish: culvert gradient, stream bankfull width, inlet blockage, and outlet perch. The survey method selected was based on the BLM's Fish Passage Through Road Crossing Assessment. Barrier severity determination was based on the BLM Coarse Screen Filter Version 2.2 The filter identifies a culvert's barrier level based on the requirements of juvenile salmonids.
*Passage status for a number of culverts was undetermined at the time data were integrated. These culverts require additional analysis that Washington County intends to undertake, to determine their fish passage status. Consequently, these barriers may completely or partially pass most if not all the species and life stages that have a need to migrate through the affected stream reach.
* Where there is stream identifier (fpbStrID), and/or stream measure (fpbStrMeas) data are linear-referenced to the 1:24,000-scale PNW Framework Hydrography.
The Diary Creek Watershed Study is available online: <http://www.co.washington.or.us/LUT/Divisions/Operations/upload/fishpr07.pdf>

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Data was converted from the Clackamas River Basin Council (CRBC) fish passage data into the Oregon fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS). Geospatial and tabular data was provided by CRBC, as well as two documents entitled "Clear and Foster Creek Fish Passage Assessment and Prioritization Project," and "Deep, Goose and Eagle Creeks Fish Passage Assessment."
The overall process for incorporating the CRBC data into the fish passage barrier data standard was as follows: 1. Obtain CRBC data. 2. Develop a crosswalk between CRBC and OFPBDS, and develop a methodology to determine which records, if not all, to include in the standard. 3. Address any issues (like unique identifiers). 4. Convert data into the standard. 5. Provide standardized data back to CRBC (and often also provide Steward-modified intermediate data developed during standardization, especially where identifiers were manipulated). 6. Throughout the entire process, CRBC was consulted. The Steward worked with the CRBC data "as is". In other words, the Steward did not attempt to review, edit or 'correct' CRBC records, locations or attributes. The goal was to get as much information into the standard as possible. Most CRBC barrier data contain attributes which match those in the standard as well as attributes which do not exist in the standard. Throughout the process of converting CRBC data into the OFPBDS, a series of determinations, assumptions and decisions were made. A CRBC - OFPBDS Crosswalk (spreadsheet) was developed and contains a record of this, along with a document detailing key GIS steps in the conversion process.
A duplication process was performed as the final stage of analysis and documented within the CRBC crosswalk to determine what, if any CRBC barriers were duplicates of pre-existing OFPBDS barriers. Using a duplication analysis model to identify potential duplicates within 150 meters, 90 of the 558 barriers were classified as potential duplicates. Out of the 90 potential duplicates, 48 were apparent duplicates, while the remaining 46 were questionable. The 48 apparent duplicate barriers were then used to update or improve missing or erroneous data in the corresponding OFPBDS features.
The entire integration process using CRBC's fish passage barrier information resulted in the addition of 469 culverts.

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Data was converted from the Calapooia Watershed Council (CWC) fish passage data into the Oregon fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS). Geospatial and tabular data was provided by CWC, as well as a document entitled "Calapooia Watershed Fish Passage Assessment."
The overall process for incorporating the CWC data into the fish passage barrier data standard was as follows: 1. Obtain CWC data. 2. Develop a crosswalk between CWC and OFPBDS, and develop a methodology to determine which records, if not all, to include in the standard. 3. Address any issues (like unique identifiers). 4. Convert data into the standard. 5. Provide standardized data back to CWC (and often also provide Steward-modified intermediate data developed during standardization, especially where identifiers were manipulated). 6. Throughout the entire process, CWC was consulted. The Steward worked with the CWC data "as is". In other words, the Steward did not attempt to review, edit or 'correct' CWC records, locations or attributes. The goal was to get as much information into the standard as possible. Most CWC barrier data contain attributes which match those in the standard as well as attributes which do not exist in the standard. Throughout the process of converting CWC data into the OFPBDS, a series of determinations, assumptions and decisions were made. A CWC - OFPBDS Crosswalk (spreadsheet) was developed and contains a record of this, along with a document detailing key GIS steps in the conversion process.
A duplication process was performed as the final stage of analysis and documented within the CWC crosswalk to determine what, if any CWC barriers were duplicates of pre-existing OFPBDS barriers. Using a duplication analysis model to identify potential duplicates within 150 meters, 65 of the 116 barriers were classified as potential duplicates. Out of the 65 potential duplicates, 48 were apparent duplicates, while the remaining 17 were questionable. The 48 apparent duplicate barriers were then used to update or improve missing or erroneous data in the corresponding OFPBDS features.
The entire integration process using CWC's fish passage barrier information resulted in the addition of 68 culverts.

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Data was integrated from the Santiam Watershed Council's (Santiam WC) fish passage data into the Oregon fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS). Geospatial and tabular data was provided by Santiam WC.
The overall process for incorporating the Santiam data into the fish passage barrier data standard was as follows: 1. Obtain Santiam WC data (107 records). 2. A crosswalk was not necessary for Santiam WC because they used ODFW's schema and existing barriers. 3. Santiam WC updated and corrected attributes of these existing fish passage barriers, most importantly, barrier dimensions and fish passage status. 4. Where Santiam WC identified multiple features at a single location, fish passage barriers records were added. Exactly 18 barriers were added, and assigned Santiam WC as the fish passage barrier originator (fpbOrNm). The remaining features retained ODFW as their original source. 5. Provide standardized data back to Santiam WC (and often also provide Steward-modified intermediate data developed during standardization, especially where identifiers were manipulated). 6. Throughout the entire process, Santiam WC was consulted. The Steward worked with the Santiam WC data "as is". In other words, the Steward did not attempt to review, edit or 'correct' Santiam WC records, locations or attributes. The goal was to get as much information into the standard as possible. Most Santiam WC barrier data contain attributes which match those in the standard as well as attributes which do not exist in the standard. The entire integration process using Santiam WC's fish passage barrier information resulted in the addition of 18 culverts.

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted the Scappoose Bay Watershed Council's (SBWC) fish passage data into the Oregon fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS). Geospatial and tabular data was provided by SBWC, as well as a document entitled "A comprehensive Assessment of Fish Passage Barriers in the Scappoose Bay Watershed."
The overall process for incorporating SBWC data into the fish passage barrier data standard was as follows: 1. Obtain SBWC data. 2. Develop a crosswalk between SBWC and OFPBDS, and develop a methodology to determine which records, if not all, to include in the standard. 3. Address any issues (like unique identifiers). 4. Convert data into the standard. 5. Provide standardized data back to SBWC (and often also provide Steward-modified intermediate data developed during standardization, especially where identifiers were manipulated). 6. Throughout the entire process, SBWC were consulted. The Steward worked with the SBWC data "as is". In other words, the Steward did not attempt to review, edit or 'correct' SBWC records, locations or attributes. The goal was to get as much information into the standard as possible. Most SBWC barrier data contain attributes which match those in the standard as well as attributes which do not exist in the standard. Throughout the process of converting SBWC data into the OFPBDS, a series of determinations, assumptions and decisions were made. A SBWC - OFPBDS Crosswalk (spreadsheet) was developed and contains a record of this, along with a document detailing key GIS steps in the conversion process.
A duplication process was performed as the final stage of analysis to determine what, if any SBWC barriers were duplicates of pre-existing OFPBDS barriers. It was determined using a 150 meter distance analysis that 13 barriers had in fact already existed in the OFPBDS dataset. In comparing the two, it was determined that the 13 newer SBWC contained more comprehensive and updated data, and subsequently, the 13 records were removed in the OFPBDS, and replaced by the SBWC records.
The entire integration process using SBWC's fish passage barrier information resulted in 1 bridge, 96 culverts, 12 dams, and 1 tidegate. The total of fish passage barrier features imported to the OFPBDS from SBWC is 110 features.

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Process_Step:

Process_Description:

Converted Siuslaw Watershed Council culvert inventory data into the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) format and loaded the data into the OFPBDS geodatabase.
Siuslaw Watershed Council culvert data exists in a point feature class shapefile, last updated in 2006. A conversion outline, or crosswalk, between Siuslaw Watershed Council and OFPBDS attributes and attribute values was developed. Siuslaw Watershed Council members who compiled the data were consulted regarding the crosswalk. U.S. Forest Service records in the Siuslaw Watershed Council data were excluded, pending receipt and review of statewide Forest Service data. OFPBDS fields were then added to the Siuslaw database and attribute values for all the point features were populated in the OFPBDS fields.
The Siuslaw Watershed Council data was then analyzed for duplication with the OFPBDS (version 1) records. Duplicate features were not added to the OFPBDS.
Spatial proximity along with attribute similarity was used to identify potential - and likely - duplicates. The threshold distance default was 150 meters. Points greater than 150 meters from a current OFPBDS (version 1) feature location were considered new features and added. Features within 150 meters of OFPBDS (version 1) features were considered potential duplicates, based on spatial proximity. Features which were potential duplicates due to proximity were compared by key attributes: stream name, road name, culvert type, width and length. If there was still a question regarding duplication after this comparison, the feature was put aside in a separate feature class for consultation.
Where there was a definitive match between a Siuslaw Watershed Council feature and an OFPBDS (version 1) culvert feature, missing attribute information was merged from the Siuslaw Watershed Council record to the OFPBDS record in order to retain it. Siuslaw Watershed Council is noted as the data source for those fields.
Siuslaw Watershed Council features were also analyzed for duplication with the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board's (OWEB) Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory (OWRI). Where a match could be made between an OWRI record and a Siuslaw Watershed Council feature, updates were made to pertinent fields.
The Siuslaw Watershed Council data were exported in September 2010 into a replica copy of the enterprise geodatabase and posted to the OFPBDS enterprise geodatabase.

Specific notes regarding the Siuslaw Watershed Council data:
* The coordinate system of the spatial coordinates in the fpbLong and fpbLat fields is GCS_North_American_1983.
*The passage status for many of the culverts is unknown at this time. Consequently, some of these barriers may be completely passable to most if not all the species and life stages that have a need to migrate through the affected stream reach.
*The Siuslaw Watershed Council data includes features located by field surveys conducted for the Council, as well as records garnered from multiple agencies, including the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, the Oregon Department of Transportation and Watershed Enhancement Board, and Lane County.
*Where there was a definitive match between an OFPBDS (version 1) and Siuslaw Watershed Council features, additional attribute information was merged from the Siuslaw Watershed Council record to the OFPBDS record in order to retain it. Siuslaw Watershed Council is noted as the data source for those fields.
* Where there is stream identifier (fpbStrID), and/or stream measure (fpbStrMeas) data are linear-referenced to the 1:24,000-scale PNW Framework Hydrography.
Siuslaw Watershed Council information is available online at <http://www.siuslaw.org/>

Process_Date: 2010

Process_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:

Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector

Point_and_Vector_Object_Information:

SDTS_Terms_Description:

SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: Entity point

Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 27860

Spatial_Reference_Information:

Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:

Planar:

Map_Projection:

Map_Projection_Name: Lambert Conformal Conic

Lambert_Conformal_Conic:

Standard_Parallel: 43.000000

Standard_Parallel: 45.500000

Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -120.500000

Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 41.750000

False_Easting: 1312335.958005

False_Northing: 0.000000

Planar_Coordinate_Information:

Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair

Coordinate_Representation:

Abscissa_Resolution: 0.000328

Ordinate_Resolution: 0.000328

Planar_Distance_Units: international feet

Geodetic_Model:

Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983

Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80

Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.000000

Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222

Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:

Altitude_System_Definition:

Altitude_Resolution: 1.000000

Altitude_Encoding_Method:

Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates

Entity_and_Attribute_Information:

Detailed_Description:

Entity_Type:

Entity_Type_Label: ofpbds_pt

Entity_Type_Definition: Fish passage barrier points

Entity_Type_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: OBJECTID

Attribute_Definition: Internal feature number.

Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Unrepresentable_Domain:

Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFtrID

Attribute_Definition:

Framework unique identifier for the fish passage barrier feature (generated by the Horizontal Steward)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Unrepresentable_Domain:

Sequential unique whole numbers that are generated by the Data Steward.

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbLong

Attribute_Definition:

Longitudinal planar component of point location on earth's surface, in geographic decimal degrees NAD83

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbLat

Attribute_Definition:

Latitudinal planar component of point location on earth's surface, in geographic decimal degrees NAD83

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbSiteID

Attribute_Definition:

Framework unique identifier for the fish passage barrier site (generated by the Horizontal Steward)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Unrepresentable_Domain:

Sequential unique whole numbers that are generated by the Data Steward.

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbRevDt

Attribute_Definition:

Date of data entry into or revision in the Framework dataset (YYYYMMDD)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbOFtrID

Attribute_Definition:

Unique ID for each fish passage barrier feature at a site, generated by the data originator

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbONm

Attribute_Definition: Name of the source originator / entity that provides the data

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbOSiteID

Attribute_Definition:

Unique ID for each fish passage barrier site, generated by the data originator

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbLocMd

Attribute_Definition: Method used to collect or generate location information

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: FieldGPS

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Field - GPS

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: FieldQuad

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Field - Record location on 7.5' quad map

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: FieldOther

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Field - other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: DigDerive

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Digitally derived (e.g. located on-screen using DOQ or DRG)

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: ExtInv

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: External inventory (e.g. National Inventory of Dams, GNIS)

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: ProfJudge

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Located on map via professional judgement (first-hand knowledge of feature location)

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbLocAccu

Attribute_Definition: Accuracy of fish passage barrier feature location (+ or - feet)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: 9999

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbLocDt

Attribute_Definition: Most recent date of location data collection (YYYYMMDD)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFtrTy

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature type

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Dam

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Dam

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Culvert

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Culvert - road stream crossing

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: WeirSill

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Weir / sill

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Falls

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Falls

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: CascadeGradientVelocity

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Cascades / gradient / velocity (including debris torrented reaches)

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: TideGate

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Tide gate

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Bridge

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Bridge - road stream crossing

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Ford

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Ford - road stream crossing

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Other known fish passage barrier feature including debris jams

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFtrNm

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature name

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbRmvDt

Attribute_Definition:

Date that fish passage barrier feature was removed (required only if removed - YYYYMMDD)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbMltFtr

Attribute_Definition: Flag for multiple fish passage barrier features at the site

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: yes

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

yes (multiple fish passage barrier features exist at the site AND features are records in the OFPBDS database)

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: no

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: no

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFPasSta

Attribute_Definition: Status of fish passage at the barrier feature

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Blocked

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Not passable

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Partial

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Partially passable - a barrier to at least some fish at some time

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Passable

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Completely passable

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbStaEvDt

Attribute_Definition: Date passage status was last evaluated (YYYYMMDD)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbStaEvMd

Attribute_Definition: Passage status evaluation method

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: USFSBLMFullAssess

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: USFS / BLM full passage assessment (e.g. FishXing)

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: OtherFullAssess

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Other full passage assessment

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: USFSBLMPartialAssess

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: USFS / BLM partial passage assessment (coarse screen filter)

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: OtherPartialAssess

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Other partial passage assessment (including professional judgement)

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: ByDesign

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: By evaluation of design plans

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: NA

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Not applicable - use NA where fish passage status is unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFySta

Attribute_Definition: Fishway status

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: FuncOkay

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Functioning, passes fish

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: NeedsMaint

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Not properly functioning, needs repair or maintenance

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Abandoned

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Abandoned fishway - no longer needed (e.g. fishway at natural falls)

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: None

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: No fishway

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: NoneMitigation

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: No fishway - mitigation provided

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: NoneExempt

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: No fishway - negligible current benefit

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBFDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: NoneConflict

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Fishway not wanted - conflicts with other native fish management needs

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: Shape

Attribute_Definition: Feature geometry.

Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Unrepresentable_Domain: Coordinates defining the features.

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFyCrit

Attribute_Definition: Flag for whether fishway meets passage criteria

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: yes

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: fishway meets passage criteria

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: no

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: fishway does not meet passage criteria

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown whether fishway meets passage criteria

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbCrdDesc

Attribute_Definition: Identifies exact location to which coordinates refer

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: Permanent_Identifier

Attribute_Definition:

Barrier feature event record permanent ID (GUID) Maintained by the Hydrography Event Mgt Tools (HEM).

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Unrepresentable_Domain: GUID values

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: ReachCode

Attribute_Definition:

ReachCode value for the NHD Flowline record that the event record references. Maintained by the HEM tools.

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Unrepresentable_Domain: Unique to NHD Flowline reaches

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: Measure

Attribute_Definition:

Measure along the NHD Flowline record where the event record is located. Maintained by the HEM tools

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Range_Domain:

Range_Domain_Minimum: 0

Range_Domain_Maximum: 100

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: EventDate

Attribute_Definition:

The date the event record was created or last modified. Maintained by the HEM tools

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: ReachSMDate

Attribute_Definition: Reach spatial modification date. Maintained by the HEM tools.

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: ReachResolution

Attribute_Definition: The resolution of the NHD source data.

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbStrID

Attribute_Definition: Stream route identifier (Framework Hydrography)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbStrMeas

Attribute_Definition: Framework stream route measure (kilometers to 3 decimal places)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbRdMile

Attribute_Definition: Field measurement of road mile point

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbStrNm

Attribute_Definition: Stream name from GNIS

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbLocONm

Attribute_Definition:

Location data provider entity (if different from identification data originator).

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbRdID

Attribute_Definition: Road route identifier (Framework - OR Road Centerline)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbRdNm

Attribute_Definition: Road name from GNIS

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFtrSTy

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature subtype

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Dam] DamPermanent

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Dam that is permanent throughout the year

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Dam] DamSeasonal

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Dam that is in place for only part of the year

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Culvert] OpenArch

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Open arch

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Culvert] OpenBox

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Open box

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Culvert] Round

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Round

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Culvert] PipeArch

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Pipe arch

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Culvert] Full Box

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Full box

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Culvert] Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Other known culvert shape

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Culvert] Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [TideGate] SideHingedAluminum

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Side-hinged orientation, aluminum material, not mechanically controlled

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [TideGate] TopHingedIronSteel

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Top-hinged orientation, iron or steel material, not mechanically controlled

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [TideGate] TopHingedWood

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Top-hinged orientation, wood material, not mechanically controlled

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [TideGate] MechanicallyControlled

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Mechanically controlled

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [TideGate] Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Other known tide gate hinge-orientation, material or controls

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [TideGate] Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Ford] Concrete

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Concrete

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Ford] Asphalt

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Asphalt

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Ford] NativeMaterial

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: On-site, native material

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Ford] Off-site rock

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Off-site rock

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Ford] Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Other known surface material

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Ford] Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFtrNmSr

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature name source

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: GNIS

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: GNIS

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbHeight

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature height (feet, 1 decimal)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbLength

Attribute_Definition:

Fish passage barrier feature length (feet, 1 decimal); distance is the measure between the furthest upstream and furthest downstream parts of the feature

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbWidth

Attribute_Definition:

Fish passage barrier feature width (feet, 1 decimal); distance is the measure between stream banks (includes dam crest length)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbSlope

Attribute_Definition:

Slope of fish passage barrier feature (percent, 1 decimal); zero value represents flat surface (as opposed to no data)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbDrop

Attribute_Definition:

Distance from culvert outlet to the water surface of the pool below (feet, 1 decimal); zero value represents no drop (as opposed to no data)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbModTy

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature modification type

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Baffles

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Feature added to a culvert to increase the hydraulic roughness

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: StreamSim

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

A channel that simulates characteristics of the adjacent natural stream channel

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Weirs

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Feature built across a stream to raise its level

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Other fish passage barrier modification to improve passage

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown modification type

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbModDesc

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature modification description

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbOrYr

Attribute_Definition:

The year the fish passage barrier feature was built or installed (origin year). Natural barriers to be assigned year of statehood (1859) unless known to be otherwise.

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbModDt

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature modification date (YYYYMMDD)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbDesONm

Attribute_Definition:

Name of description data originator / entity (if different from identification data originator)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbOwn

Attribute_Definition: Owner of the fish passage barrier feature

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbLOwn

Attribute_Definition:

Owner of the land where the fish passage barrier feature is located

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbOperate

Attribute_Definition: Operator of the fish passage barrier feature

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFyOwn

Attribute_Definition: Fishway owner

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbOwnTy

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature owner type

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Federal

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Federal

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: State

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: State

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Tribal

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Tribal

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Private

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Private

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: PubUtility

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Public Utility

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: PubSpDistrict

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Special district - water control, irrigation, drainage

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: County

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: County

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: City

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: City

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbLOwnTy

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature landowner type

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Federal

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Federal

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: State

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: State

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Tribal

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Tribal

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Private

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Private

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: PubUtility

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Public Utility

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: PubSpDistrict

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Special district - water control, irrigation, drainage

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: County

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: County

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: City

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: City

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbOwnONm

Attribute_Definition:

Name of ownership data originator / entity (if different from identification data originator)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFyTy

Attribute_Definition: Fishway type

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Pool

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Pool style fishways have a series of distinct pools in which the energy of the flow entering each one is entirely dissipated prior to flowing to the next

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: BaffledChute

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Chutes or flumes with roughness, designed to reduce velocity, allowing fish passage

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Hybrid

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Combination of multiple fishway types

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: FullSpanning

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: A fishway that crosses the entire stream channel

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Trap

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:

Structures that direct the stream flow to attract upstream migrants into holding (impoundment) areas

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Other known fishway type

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: Unknown

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Unknown fishway type

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFySTy

Attribute_Definition: Fishway subtype

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute_Domain_Values:

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Pool] PoolVertSlot

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Vertical slot

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Pool] PoolAndWeir

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Pool and weir

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Pool] PoolWeirOrifice

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Weir and orifice

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Pool] PoolSecChan

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Engineered secondary channel

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Pool] PoolOther

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Pool - other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [BaffledChute] BChuteAKSteep

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Alaska Steeppass

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [BaffledChute] BChuteDenil

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Denil

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [BaffledChute] BChuteSecChan

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Engineered secondary channel

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [BaffledChute] BChuteOther

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Baffled chute - other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Hybrid] HybridPoolChute

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Pool and chute

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Hybrid] HybridSecChan

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Engineered secondary channel

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Hybrid] HybridOther

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Hybrid - other

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [FullSpanning] FlSpanRockWeir

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Rock weirs

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [FullSpanning] FlSpanLogWeir

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Log weirs

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [FullSpanning] FlSpanConcreteWeir

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Concrete weirs

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [FullSpanning] FlSpanOtherWeir

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Full spanning - other weirs

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [FullSpanning] FlSpanRoughChan

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Roughened channel

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [FullSpanning] FlSpanHybridChan

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Hybrid channel

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [FullSpanning] FlSpanOtherChan

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Full spanning - other channel

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Trap] TrapPass

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Trap and pass - includes mechanical lifts / locks

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Enumerated_Domain:

Enumerated_Domain_Value: [Trap] TrapHaul

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Trap and haul

Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFyOrYr

Attribute_Definition: The year the fishway was built or installed (origin year)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFPasONm

Attribute_Definition:

Name of fish passage data originator / entity (if different from identification data originator)

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbLocMdD

Attribute_Definition:

Fish passage barrier feature location collection method - description for "other"

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFtrTyD

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature type - description for "other"

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFtrSTyD

Attribute_Definition: Fish passage barrier feature subtype - description for "other"

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbEvMdFAD

Attribute_Definition:

Fish passage status evaluation method - description for "other full assessment"

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbOwnTyD

Attribute_Definition: Barrier feature owner type - description for other

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbEvMdPAD

Attribute_Definition:

Fish passage status evaluation method - description for "other partial assessment"

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbComment

Attribute_Definition:

Additional, relevant information about the fish passage barrier feature

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbFyTyD

Attribute_Definition: Fishway type - description for "other"

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Attribute:

Attribute_Label: fpbLOwnTyD

Attribute_Definition:

Fish passage barrier feature landowner type - description for "other"

Attribute_Definition_Source: OFPBDS

Overview_Description:

Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:

Detailed information for the OFPBDS feature attributes can be found online at <http://www.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/docs/bioscience/OregonFishPassageBarrierDataStandardv1dot1.pdf>

Distribution_Information:

Distributor:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Address:

Address_Type: mailing and physical address

Address: 3406 Cherry Avenue NE

City: Salem

State_or_Province: Oregon

Postal_Code: 97303

Country: United States

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Resource_Description: Downloadable Data

Distribution_Liability:

No warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the accuracy or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data. It is also strongly recommended that careful attention be paid to the contents of the metadata file associated with these data. Neither the Data Steward nor the data originators shall be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein.

Standard_Order_Process:

Fees: none

Ordering_Instructions:

Download from <http://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/nrimp/default.aspx?pn=fishbarrierdata>

Available_Time_Period:

Time_Period_Information:

Single_Date/Time:

Calendar_Date: 20110217

Metadata_Reference_Information:

Metadata_Date: 20110217

Metadata_Contact:

Contact_Information:

Contact_Organization_Primary:

Contact_Organization: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Contact_Person: Jon Bowers

Contact_Position: GIS Coordinator

Contact_Address:

Address_Type: mailing and physical address

Address: 3406 Cherry Avenue NE

City: Salem

State_or_Province: Oregon

Postal_Code: 97303

Country: United States

Contact_Voice_Telephone: 503-947-6097

Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jon.k.bowers@state.or.us

Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata

Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998

Metadata_Time_Convention: local time

Metadata_Access_Constraints: None.

Metadata_Security_Information:

Metadata_Security_Classification: Unclassified

Metadata_Extensions:

Online_Linkage: <http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html>

Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile